A federal agent stands guard at Delaney Hall, an immigration detention facility in Newark, New Jersey, on 30 May 2026. Photograph: Julius Constantine Motal/The GuardianView image in fullscreenA federal agent stands guard at Delaney Hall, an immigration detention facility in Newark, New Jersey, on 30 May 2026. Photograph: Julius Constantine Motal/The GuardianICE (US Immigration and Customs Enforcement)ICE will not reveal body-camera footage unless in agency’s ‘best interests’Much-delayed devices to be deployed by end of month after immigration agents involved in deaths or serious injuriesRichard Luscombe and agencyFri 7 Aug 2026 17.08 CESTLast modified on Fri 7 Aug 2026 17.09 CESTSharePrefer the Guardian on GoogleOfficers for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will be equipped with much-delayed body cameras by the end of next month, it was reported on Friday. But experts have questioned the transparency of a policy that allows the ICE director to restrict the public release of footage unless “it is in the best interests of the agency”.Pressure has mounted on the Trump administration to provide body cameras after people caught up in encounters with federal immigration personnel suffered death or serious injuries.Two men were shot and killed by ICE agents, in Texas and Maine, last month in circumstances similar to the death of another man during a traffic stop in Illinois last September. None of the officers involved was wearing a camera.Tom Homan, Trump’s so-called border czar, said last month that ICE officers would be required to have at least one body camera recording during future vehicle stops. Policy for body-worn cameras was first established in a February 2025 ICE directive, but funding for their provision was held up by this year’s partial government shutdown, Homan said.ICE is now tracking nearly 54,000 immigrants via ankle monitorsRead moreThe intention of using such cameras, according to David Venturella, the ICE acting director, is to increase transparency and accountability.One analyst, however, told the Associated Press that an accompanying “selective release” policy of footage meant taxpayers who put up more than $30m for the cameras may still be kept in the dark about some high-profile confrontations, at least in their immediate aftermath.Christopher Schneider, a sociology professor at Canada’s Brandon University, and co-author of Police Body-Worn Cameras: Media and the New Discourse of Police Reform, said the ICE director would have discretion to release recordings that reflect well on the agency’s image while working to keep others secret.“In some ways, ICE is saying the quiet part out loud,” he said. “Body-worn cameras are being used as contemporary image-work tools to present the police to the public in the most favorable way possible.”The policy says ICE will promptly release video of shootings and other encounters in which its agents cause death or serious injury only after determining “it is in the best interests of the agency” to do so.It requires officers to activate cameras during routine enforcement activities, including while making arrests, executing search warrants and responding to emergencies.After shootings or other serious confrontations, a committee that includes top ICE officials and lawyers will review footage and recommend whether to release it promptly, according to the February 2025 policy.If the ICE director finds that “specific and compelling circumstances” justify withholding the video, they have the authority to block or indefinitely delay the release, the policy says.The Trump administration slow-walked a pilot program last year to provide cameras to ICE personnel, it was reported in January, and moved to cut funding.Civilian cellphone footage of the deaths of protesters Renee Good and Alex Pretti at the hands of federal immigration officers in separate January incidents in Minneapolis allowed their families and supporters to challenge authorities’ accounts of the encounters.Homan, in a TV appearance on Fox & Friends last month, said he welcomed the imminent rollout of the cameras.“They exonerate more law enforcement than they convict, and I want officers to wear body cameras because I want the American people to see what the officers saw when they took that action,” he said.The Associated Press contributed to this reportExplore more on these topicsICE (US Immigration and Customs Enforcement)newsShareReuse this content
