Why Uganda is winning the battle against Ebola as virus spreads in DR CongoImage source, Getty ImagesImage caption, Uganda said previous outbreaks have taught the authorities how to respond efficiently to EbolaByAnne Soy, BBC Newsday and Wedaeli ChibelushiPublished2 August 2026The Ebola outbreak in the east of the Democratic Republic of Congo has become the second-worst on record, with the official death toll passing a grim milestone of 1,500.Experts believe the true number of fatalities during this outbreak, which was declared in May, is much higher. And in another alarming update, authorities in DR Congo confirmed on Thursday that the virus was spreading much faster than in previous outbreaks.Next door in Uganda, a country that also reported infections in May, the picture is entirely different.The country's health minister described a "moment of joy" as the last Ebola patient was released from hospital two weeks ago.Uganda only ever recorded 20 cases and two deaths from the virus.According to Dr Kasonde Mwinga, the World Health Organization's Uganda chief, the relatively low number of casualties was not "by luck or chance"."It's because people invested in preparedness," she told the BBC.This outbreak is the 17th to have emerged in DR Congo since Ebola was discovered 50 years ago. By comparison Uganda has had nine since 2000, with officials there saying lessons learnt from past tragedies have allowed them to stop the disease ripping through the country on various occasions.One example is the case of a 12-year-old girl who arrived at a hospital in the central district of Luwero in 2011. Her symptoms sparked caution: she was isolated, medics wore personal protective equipment when treating her and when she died three hours later her body was carefully sealed in a coffin. These precautions were able to halt the spread of what a blood sample later confirmed to be Ebola."We know Ebola. It's been here a few times, we know how to deal with it," government spokesperson Alan Kasujja told the BBC's Newsday programme.Uganda's first known case this time was a man from DR Congo who crossed the border for treatment.Once health authorities confirmed multiple cases had been imported from DR Congo, they activated a specialist Ebola treatment centre at Mulago hospital, in the capital city, Kampala. The facility, which was used during an outbreak of Ebola last year, held leftover medical supplies and had an "emergency medical team" on standby, Dr David Kaggwa, head of the facility, said."It was a matter of sorting and ordering a few more supplies, and then actually in one day we were ready to receive the patients. So, it is easy, it's not that we're starting from scratch," he said.What is Ebola and why is stopping the latest outbreak so difficult?Published16 July'They said it isn't real': Ebola rumours fuel attacks on health workersPublished9 JulyOut of the 20 people who tested positive in Uganda, 15 came from DR Congo. The first two cases, it is thought, might not have known what condition they had. But after Uganda and DR Congo jointly declared the Ebola outbreak on 15 May, people with symptoms - which include headaches, fever and vomiting - "came direct to the treatment unit," Dr Kaggwa said.He suspects that because these patients did not pass through general hospitals, and come into contact with those patients and medics, there was little opportunity for community transmission.In a bid to stop the disease spreading, the authorities also closed the border between Uganda and DR Congo, despite the financial impact this would have on Ugandans who travel between the two countries to trade.Uganda acted fast, but it also had an advantage over DR Congo when it came to responding to the virus. Before the first cases were reported in DR Congo, Ebola had been spreading undetected for weeks. This was because health officials poised to pick up outbreaks had been testing for common species of Ebola, and not the rare species behind the current outbreak, named Bundibugyo.Uganda only detected its first case after DR Congo had identified and publicised multiple infections - knowledge of the outbreak was out in the open and Uganda could therefore act quickly to contain the virus.Image source, Getty ImagesImage caption, At-risk communities in Uganda have complied with prevention efforts, a government spokesperson says"Surveillance mechanisms were put in place then it was easy to identify all the patients quickly," Dr Kaggwa said.Comparatively, DR Congo has had a harder time with surveillance and contact tracing.One field investigator tasked with tracking the virus across Bunia, a city at the epicentre of the outbreak, told Reuters that surveillance had been hampered by poor planning, logistical bottlenecks and the recruitment of inexperienced staff."We discover the disease only after it has already spread," Dr Moubarack Kano said. "We're just chasing it."This is not helped by the insecurity that plagues eastern DR Congo. Ituri, the province at the centre of the outbreak, has been under military rule for several years as the army tries to crack down on dozens of armed groups there.Further south of Ituri there are large areas held by the M23 rebels, a powerful militia that says it has managed to contain the outbreak.Its Ebola response co-ordinator Dr Fred Kaniki attributed the achievement to early detection and contact tracing, telling the BBC: "In the course of a month we registered two more cases originating from those index cases and successfully followed up 400 people."But the M23 conflict and other pockets of violence have displaced millions of people in the region - and that makes surveillance difficult in DR Congo. Artisanal mining and cross-border trade also means Ebola has more chances to spread as people are constantly on the move.In contrast, Uganda managed to quarantine more than 6,000 contacts of people known to have Ebola during the outbreak. These contacts were isolated for an incubation period of 21 days."T
