sözaltı news World
World
EN AZ
Almost all NSW homes destroyed in black summer bushfires were within 100 metres of flammable vegetation

Almost all NSW homes destroyed in black summer bushfires were within 100 metres of flammable vegetation

theguardian.com 17.10.2026 21:00 4 views
Exclusive: Research confirms official advice about high-risk properties and warns worsening conditions will make more homes unsafeSign up for climate and environment editor Adam Morton’s free Clear Air newsletter hereAlm

Almost every home destroyed in New South Wales during the black summer bushfires of 2019 and 2020 was inside the 100 metre buffer zone used to identify properties most at risk, new research has found. The findings are an endorsement of the risk maps used by authorities, but the research warns that as global heating generates ever-worsening fire conditions firefighters may have to extend the recommended distances between homes and vegetation to keep homes safe. The NSW rural fire service said the findings reinforced how homes in high risk areas should be built to higher fire standards as it prepared for a potentially “challenging” fire season.

More than 3,000 homes were lost across the country during the unprecedented fires six years ago that took 33 lives and killed or displaced almost 3 billion native animals. Of the 2,475 homes lost in NSW, the research, published in the International Journal of Wildland Fire, found 94% were less than 100 metres away from flammable vegetation such as trees. The 100 metre buffer is a key part of the widely used maps of bushfire prone land that firefighters use to plan local outreach activities, and planning authorities use to assess how bushfire-resistant new homes and renovations should be.

Associate professor Owen Price, an expert in bushfire risk at the University of Wollongong who led the research, said the findings showed a key aspect of the method to identify buildings at risk from bushfires was “more or less spot on”. Distance to vegetation is really important and that 100 metre rule that they apply is pretty good,” he said. But the research also examined fire danger ratings – an index that combines temperature, wind, humidity and the dryness of fuel – on the days when each home was lost.

When the fire danger ratings – known technically as the Forest Fire Danger Index – reached extreme or catastrophic conditions, “houses further away [than 100 metres] were burning,” said Price. We know the direction of travel.” a free newsletter He said wildfire researchers were alarmed by the increasing number of fires around the world hitting and moving through urban areas, including the 2025 Los Angeles Eaton fire that killed 19 people and destroyed or damaged thousands of homes and businesses. Part of his own research was aimed at understanding if similar events could be replicated in Australia.

The research warned that the “current regulation may become less useful over time” as the climate crisis increased the risk of homes being lost. Melissa O’Halloran, responsible for work on bushfire planning at the NSW rural fire service, said the research showed that “houses in that [bushfire prone] area should be built to a higher construction standard”. Homes within bushfire prone land in the state are allowed to remove trees within 10 metres of a house and clear understory within 50 metres.

She said the service was reviewing its main bushfire protection policy that would consider the increasing climate risk. It isn’t just temperatures, it’s also about how quickly the landscape dries out, as well as extreme pyroconvective fires,” she said. Inspector James Morris, of the NSW rural fire service, said there was already heightened risk this year for fires in northern parts of the state, in the central west and the far south coast.

Extract — continue reading at the source.

Read full story