The preprint database arXiv has been forced to limit paper submissions to stem a vast and quickening flood of AI-generated papers. Academics tell New Scientist that the massive influx of AI-generated papers is threatening to overwhelm the database and render it useless. ArXiv offers a place for academics to host papers that haven’t yet been peer-reviewed or published in reputable journals.
This gives colleagues a chance to keep up to date with what’s ahead in fields as diverse as physics, astronomy and economics. But AI’s dramatic growth in mathematical prowess and its ability to automatically generate papers at speed with minimal human effort mean that the arXiv website is being flooded with an increasing number of papers. I made a free AI chatbot solve a decade-long maths problem in 13 minutes In September 2024, 20,569 papers were submitted to arXiv.
The following September, that number had grown to 26,646. But in a dramatic surge, 40,363 papers were submitted in September 2026. Aleksandr Logunov at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology warns that the problem is serious.
Kevin Buzzard at Imperial College London says it has also become harder to submit genuine papers because arXiv moderators are overwhelmed, and papers can now disappear into the review queue for weeks at a time. The number of published papers is so large that Buzzard can’t manually read them every day. Ironically, he now has to use AI to tell him which papers to focus on.
The issue is that slop papers do not explain stuff well. It’s not just about correctness; it’s about human understanding, and AI is sometimes very poor at explaining.” With access to powerful AI tools, non-professional mathematicians are now able to solve reasonably difficult problems and automatically generate papers outlining the results that can then be posted to arXiv. But such papers are often criticised by mathematicians.
For instance, Chaim Goodman-Strauss at the University of Arkansas described one paper this week – which included a valid solution to a long-standing problem – as “basically a piece of slop”. Terence Tao at the University of California, Los Angeles, recently complained to New Scientist that the way in which discoveries are being made and “dumped” on the mathematical community may actually harm the field. AI models are solving mathematics problems with increasing pace, and a technique called formalisation is key to demonstrating that their claimed solutions are indeed correct.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
