Days after conservationists warned that changes to wild horse policy could put federally protected animals at greater risk, a new controversy has erupted over wolves in Montana after state officials admitted they may have significantly overestimated how many of the predators live there. Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks recently revised its wolf population estimate from 1,094 animals to about 725 after changing the way it counts wolves. Despite the lower figure, state commissioners voted this week to allow up to 300 wolves to be killed during the upcoming hunting and trapping season, drawing accusations of "trophy hunting" from wildlife advocates.
The dispute began when Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks changed the model it uses to estimate wolf numbers. The revised calculation put the state's wolf population at roughly 725 animals, down from a previous estimate of 1,094. The change prompted agency biologists to recommend reducing the number of wolves that could be killed during the upcoming season from previous levels to 250.
But during a meeting on August 19, the Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission voted to approve a higher limit of 300 wolves. Commissioners debated how much confidence should be placed in the new population estimate, with some arguing the revised figure may itself be too conservative. The final plan divided the state's wolf kill limit into regional quotas.
The move came after FWP acknowledged that its previous counting method had overstated wolf numbers by nearly 400 animals. Critics now say that should have prompted a far more cautious approach. Greg Lemon, administrator of Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks' Communication & Education Division, told Newsweek the agency's recommendation reflected its long history of managing wolves and its legal obligation to maintain a sustainable population.
"We felt that reducing the quota for this year would allow us to continue to follow state law and ensure that wolf numbers remain well above limits outlined in our wolf plan," Lemon said, adding that wolf numbers have remained well above thresholds that would trigger consideration of renewed federal protections. Lemon noted that, while FWP provides recommendations, the Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission makes the final decision on hunting regulations. Lemon rejected suggestions that Montana's approach amounts to "trophy hunting." Several wildlife advocacy organizations condemned the commission's decision following the vote, arguing that state officials ignored both public feedback and uncertainty surrounding wolf numbers.
"Montana is treating wolves as a commodity to be handed over to the special interests that want to kill them, rather than as wildlife held in trust for all Montanans," Michelle Lute, executive director of Wildlife for All, said in a statement released after the meeting. Wolf advocate group Team Wolf and others have argued that Montana's wolf policies increasingly prioritize reducing wolf populations over maintaining them. They point to hunting and trapping rules that permit methods including trapping, snares and other techniques they say go beyond traditional wildlife management.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
