This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: It is thought the sun may have engulfed a super-Earth-sized planet early in its history. Now, a new study has gone a step further, suggesting that such an event may have left behind detectable clues inside the sun that could still be visible today.
Researchers explore the idea of a measurable signature, or "fingerprints," in the present-day solar interior in research published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Mutlu Yildiz, a professor at Ege University in Turkey, said, "Our new study suggests that a planet several times more massive than Earth may have fallen into the young sun and left a lasting chemical imprint deep inside it. "By modeling the sun's evolution and comparing the results with precise observations of its interior, we find that the ingestion of a super-Earth could help explain long-standing differences between standard solar models and observations, including subtle changes in the sun's internal structure and its depleted lithium abundance." Researchers also found that such a world could survive its passage through the sun's outer layers while losing very little mass, suggesting that planets may leave detectable fingerprints inside their host stars long after they have disappeared.
For many years, solar models based on the standard physics of stellar evolution have had difficulty reproducing some helioseismic observations simultaneously, particularly the sound-speed structure just below the convection zone and the depth of the solar convection zone. At the same time, the sun shows a strong and well-known depletion of lithium at its surface. "We were interested in whether these problems might have a common origin in the early chemical history of the sun," Yildiz explained.
"Young stars are surrounded by protoplanetary disks, where substantial amounts of material can move between the disk and the star. "Since planets are made of material that is chemically different from the gas in the disk, we wondered whether the early engulfment of a planet could have left a chemical signature inside the young sun." The researchers used the MESA stellar-evolution code to test their idea. They explored different accretion histories and compared the resulting solar models with helioseismic constraints and surface abundances, while also testing alternative explanations involving the equation of state, opacity and different prescriptions for turbulent and convective mixing.
Their results favor a scenario in which the young sun engulfed a super-Earth around five to 10 times the mass of Earth. Importantly, their modeling does more than explain one puzzle. It simultaneously matches several independent measurements of the sun, including observations of its interior and its unusually low lithium abundance.
"We thought planetary engulfment might affect the solar structure but did not expect the calculations to converge on such a specific super-Earth mass range," said Yildiz. "That was one of the most interesting outcomes of the study." He added that while it may not be possible to definitively prove the sun swallowed a planet, if the predicted structural and chemical signature could be independently identified through helioseismic or other observations, it would provide strong evidence for such an event happening billions of years ago. Astronomers have long wondered why many other star systems appear to have large super-Earths, while ours has none.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
