This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: European deportation practices are governed by a complex web of European, national and human rights law, says the author of a paper published in the International Journal of Migration and Border Studies. Based on 100,000 French court cases, the study shows that national courts play a central role in determining whether individuals can be removed.
The research considers whether deportation is a form of "compulsory mobility." In other words, movement across borders is imposed on individuals through legal orders rather than undertaken voluntarily. It brings together forms of removal that are often treated separately, including returns, expulsions and Dublin transfers, under which an asylum seeker may be transferred to another European country responsible for examining their claim. The research examined deportation judgments issued by French first-instance administrative courts between June 2022 and June 2025.
France accounts for almost a third of return decisions issued to third-country nationals in the European Union, while deportation cases make up more than a quarter of judgments in those administrative courts. The study found overlapping rules derived from EU asylum and migration law, EU citizenship law, readmission agreements and human rights protections, including safeguards concerning family life and inhumane or degrading treatment. But these rules create competing pressures: Legal frameworks generally facilitate removal, while human rights protections restrict it.
Because deportation orders can be challenged individually, national judges must reconcile these conflicting rules in everyday cases. The work suggests that the way Europe's deportation system functions cannot be understood solely through European-level legislation. Its practical effects are also shaped by how national courts interpret and apply that framework in thousands of individual cases.
Anouk Lamé, Reconciling the tensions of the European deportation regime: how the law shapes compulsory mobility across borders, International Journal of Migration and Border Studies (2026). DOI: 10.1504/ijmbs.2026.156396 BA art history, MA material culture. Former museum editor, paramedic, and transplant coordinator.
Editing for Science X since 2021. Full profile → Master's in physics with research experience. Long-time science news enthusiast.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
