Generative artificial intelligence tools are being increasingly used by scientists, especially as writing aids for researchers outside English-dominant institutions. However, these tools might narrow interpretations even when applied to increasingly diverse samples. Sampling diversity will not be enough to broaden behavioural science if interpretive diversity is lost.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout Henrich, J., Heine, S. The weirdest people in the world? Brain Sci. 33, 61–83 (2010).
G., Toscanelli, C. & Arnett, J. The neglected 95% revisited: is American psychology becoming less American? Psychol. 76, 116–129 (2021).
Moriguchi, Y. & Kanakogi, Y. The future of AI-assisted science is both fast and slow. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-026-02574-6 (2026).
Tao, Y., Viberg, O., Baker, R. Cultural bias and cultural alignment of large language models. PNAS Nexus 3, pgae346 (2024).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Blasi, D. E., Henrich, J., Adamou, E., Kemmerer, D. & Majid, A. Over-reliance on English hinders cognitive science.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
