During natural vision, humans make saccades approximately every 250–300 ms to fixate on important objects in a scene. Given this rapid succession of eye movements, it has been proposed that visual processing begins in the parafovea, prior to fixation. Such parafoveal previewing may serve as a form of priming, facilitating subsequent processing at fixation.
In this study, we investigate whether parafoveal priming leads to both a reduced neural response (akin to repetition suppression) and a more selective neural representation, consistent with neuronal sharpening. Participants perform a visual exploration task involving natural object images that are either parafoveally previewed or not, while magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data is recorded. Event-related fields reveal a reduced neural response when an image is parafoveally presented 250 ms earlier.
Moreover, multivariate pattern analysis shows enhanced decoding of object category following parafoveal priming, suggesting increased neural specificity. These findings support the idea that parafoveal previewing contributes to neural sharpening, potentially aiding evidence accumulation by forming sparse and precise representations of objects during visual scene exploration. We would like to thank Sara Calzolari, Camille Fakche, Oscar Ferrante, Brandon Ingram, Dongwei Li, Nina Salman, Yali Pan, Christopher Townsend, Jonathan Winter, Lijuan Wang, and the University of Birmingham’s BlueBEAR HPC service.
This work was also supported by a Wellcome Trust Discovery Award (grant number 227420) and the NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203316) attributed to O.J. Neuroimaging Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Syanah C. Wynn, Yulia Bezsudnova & Ole Jensen UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK Oxford Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK Correspondence to Syanah C.
The authors declare no competing interests. Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
