New York's teacher shortage is a crisis, and no single school system can solve it alone. When schools cannot recruit or retain capable educators, children risk losing consistent instruction, and families face uncertainty. I believe education policy needs a basic correction.
Any plan to expand or improve schools must explain how we will find, prepare, and keep the people responsible for teaching in them. The problem extends well beyond this city. The National Center for Education Statistics reported that 74 percent of public schools with teaching vacancies had difficulty filling at least one position before the 2024-2025 school year.
That was an improvement over the previous year, but it still reflected widespread hiring challenges. This is a national recruitment crisis, and it should be treated like one. If we stay on this path, we will reach a point where too few people want to become teachers at all, and no expansion plan survives that.
Schools should be competing for the same top graduates who take offers from Goldman Sachs, and we should be giving them a real reason to say 'yes.' The recent exchange between Nikole Hannah-Jones and Eva Moskowitz reveals how they approach educational inequality differently. Hannah-Jones emphasizes segregation and unequal opportunity. Moskowitz argues that charter schools can offer families an effective alternative.
Both raise serious points, but the debate keeps asking the wrong question. As a country, we have to stop treating this as a contest between public, charter, and private schools. It should not be about being pro-public school, pro-charter school, or pro-private school.
It should be about being pro-education, which means no longer tearing one sector down to lift another or holding any of them back from growing. Every one of those schools is serving children. We start by admitting that what we are doing in this country is not working, and that every one of those visions depends on reliable, capable classroom staff.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
