Perceived usefulness of AI-generated music predicts learning engagement and flow through attention and AI trust

The integration of artificial intelligence into educational environments has prompted increasing interest in how AI-generated content is associated with student learning. This study examines the psychological pathways linking perceived usefulness of AI-generated music with university students’ learning engagement and flow experience, with mindful attentional awareness and AI trust functioning as parallel mediators. Drawing on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and cognitive load theory, the study tests a structural model in which perceived usefulness predicts attention and AI trust, which in turn predict learning engagement and flow.

A post-exposure cross-sectional survey was administered to 407 university students after a four-week naturalistic AI-music listening protocol. Data were analysed using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) via SmartPLS 4.0. Perceived usefulness significantly predicted both attention and AI trust, and both mediators were positively associated with learning engagement and flow.

All six hypothesised direct paths and four indirect paths were supported. By integrating technology evaluation, attentional disposition, and learning experience in one model, the study extends TAM beyond adoption intention and identifies two complementary pathways through which students’ evaluations of AI-generated music are associated with learning-related outcomes. The authors declare no competing interests.

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The study protocol was reviewed by the Committee of the Shanxi University, which determined that formal ethical approval was not required due to the anonymous, voluntary, and non-interventional nature of the online survey (decision number: SXULL2026005). Electronic informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to participation.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.