The Queensland government’s latest law and order crackdown – subjecting some children as young as 10 to a mandatory sentence of a year behind bars – could lead to “cruel outcomes”, according to human rights lawyers. In documents tabled with the legislation on Thursday, the government conceded its laws, dubbed “breach bail, go to jail”, would breach human rights and risk further straining the state’s overcrowded jails, youth detention centres and police watch houses. It requires an override of the Queensland Human Rights Act.
The legislation applies to a child or adult charged with a “significant offence” while on bail, or failing to appear for a court matter. For children, a “significant offence” is any of the government’s 47 previously legislated adult crime adult time offences, such as dangerous operation of a vehicle, robbery, and entering a premises and committing an indictable offence. For adults, they also additionally include sexual offences against children and coercive control.
A person on bail accused of one of the offences would face a much higher bar to be granted bail again. The bill requires that they be remanded in custody unless the court or a police officer is satisfied to a “high degree of confidence” that they would not commit another significant offence. If convicted of the second offence, they would be subjected to a mandatory minimum 12-month sentence, without parole.
It could be served concurrently with any other sentence for the additional offence. The law applies even if the person is found not guilty of the first offence. The government concedes that the legislation limits a range of rights including the right to liberty, that persons awaiting trial should not automatically be detained in custody, and the right of children to protection in their best interests.
It also concedes that the additional offence will lead to overcrowding in the state’s corrective services facilities and youth detention centre and as a result “will impact the conditions of detention, engaging the right to humane treatment when deprived of liberty”. Under the Queensland Human Rights Act, an override is only permitted where exceptional circumstances, such as a state of emergency, exists. In documents tabled with the bill, the attorney general, Deb Frecklington, said they were “the prevalence of serious repeat offending committed while on bail”.
Human rights lawyer Bridget Burton, a senior lecturer at the University of Queensland, said there appeared to be no apparent exceptional circumstances justifying the laws, and they would remove judicial discretion, leading to unreasonable sentences. He said the court system could already take into account previous offending when determining whether to grant bail and the law removed that discretion. Wood said the bill would probably affect only the least serious offenders, because a person convicted of a violent offence would already be sentenced to longer than the 12-month term.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
