The 9th Circuit stripped Snap's Section 230 immunity, opening 3,000+ lawsuits and sending SNAP shares down 3% after an overnight plunge to $4.74. Meta and Pinterest fell 3% and 4%, respectively, as the ruling cast an industry-wide liability shadow across social media platforms. Snap's Q2 revenue beat of $1.6 billion and EBITDA surging to $250 million from $41 million couldn't offset analyst caution over unquantifiable litigation risk.
It sounds nuts, but SoFi1 is giving new Active Invest users up to $3,000 in stock for a limited time, and all it takes is a $50 deposit to get started.2 See for yourself (Sponsor) Snap (NYSE:SNAP) shares are down 3% to $5.24 Monday midday, giving back part of a sharp overnight decline that saw the stock fall as much as 12% to $4.74 before buyers stepped in. The catalyst is a federal appeals court ruling that pierces a legal shield social platforms have long relied upon. The intraday recovery matters as much as the initial drop.
It suggests the market is trying to price an unquantifiable legal overhang rather than treating the ruling as an outright crisis. Snap stock now sits closer to the low end of a 52-week range of $3.81 to $9.28, with shares down 33% year to date (YTD) and 24% over the past year. The weakness extends across the sector.
Reddit (NYSE:RDDT), Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META), Pinterest (NYSE:PINS), and the sector ETF all trade lower, framing the ruling as an industry-wide liability question rather than a Snap-only problem. On August 10 the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the Section 230 immunity sought by Snap and other large social media companies.
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act has historically shielded platforms from liability tied to user-generated content, and the decision narrows that protection. SoFi Active Invest is offering a limited-time promotion. Open an account, fund it with $50 or more, and you could receive up to $3,000 in complimentary stock for Active Invest accounts.
See for yourself by clicking here now. The ruling clears the way for more than 3,000 consolidated lawsuits brought by states, municipalities, school districts and families to proceed. The complaints allege that Snapchat was deliberately designed with features intended to maximize engagement among minors.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
