If you try to send a wire transfer on a Friday afternoon, your money will disappear into the bowels of the financial system until Monday (at the earliest!). When a business needs to send dollars from the United States to a vendor in Southeast Asia, their payment is routed through three or four intermediary banks, each taking a fee and adding additional delay. In an era when a text message can circle the globe in milliseconds, money sure does travel like it's 1970.
Stablecoins were supposed to fix this. These are digital tokens pegged to the dollar (one token is usually redeemable for one dollar at any time) that move over blockchain networks, settling in seconds rather than days. Once a crypto curiosity, stablecoins now rest on a solid legal foundation, and Wall Street has taken enthusiastic notice.
But here is what their enthusiasm misses: New technology alone won’t modernize banking. The real opportunity here isn’t layering stablecoins onto old banks. It’s the chance to create a new generation of federally chartered banks built from the ground up around this technology.
To understand why, you have to look at how money actually moves. When you send a payment, it looks like money is traveling across the globe. But usually, those dollars don't actually travel anywhere at all.
Instead, banks tweak balances on their internal ledgers and settle up with one another through global messaging networks. These systems work OK, but they were designed generations ago. They still process transactions in batches, move painfully slowly, and close on weekends and holidays.
International payments are even worse. Most banks in most countries can’t hold dollars directly. For instance, when a bank in Vietnam or Kenya "holds dollars," what it really holds is a balance in an account at an American bank.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
