The case against buying and holding stocks for the long term

The case against buying and holding stocks for the long term The case against buying and holding stocks for the long term The number of stocks outperforming the index over time is shrinking, increasing the need for active managers to be nimble Holding stocks for the long term isn’t a surefire winner. via For decades, Wall Street’s golden rule has been to buy winning stocks and hold them forever. But according to Adam Parker, founder of Trivariate Research, that strategy may be reaching its expiration date. The rise of short-dated options and leveraged ETFs has helped to supercharge the gap between the winners and losers in the stock market.

As a result, the percentage of stocks outperforming the S&P 500 Copyright ©2026 MarketWatch, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8 I spend my time and money caring for my aging mother — yet she gave my brother $100,000. Should I pull back? 8% mortgage rates are ‘not an impossibility’ as the 30-year fixed rate surges It’s no secret that Social Security and Medicare are on the ropes.

Here’s what to do instead of panicking. Here are 3 alternatives for investors looking to dodge the bond-market beatdown Joseph Adinolfi is assistant managing editor, markets. Intraday Data provided by FACTSET and subject to terms of use.

Historical and current end-of-day data provided by FACTSET. All quotes are in local exchange time. Real-time last sale data for U.S. stock quotes reflect trades reported through Nasdaq only.

Intraday data delayed at least 15 minutes or per exchange requirements.