Gender polarization in fields such as engineering or nursing has served as a barrier to students whose genders do not conform to these norms. Cimpian et al. demonstrate that this polarization also protects lower-performing students who do conform, while impeding LGBTQ+ students in male-dominated fields. This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout Goldin, C., Katz, L.
Perspect. 20, 133–156 (2006). R., Woznicki, N. & Kim, T. Behav. https://doi.org/ (2026).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Moss-Racusin, C. Psychol. 12, 713839 (2021). L. in Handbook of Social Psychology (ed.
Delamater, J.) 29–51 (Springer US, 2006). Achieving Educational Excellence: A Critical Assessment of Priorities and Practices in Higher Education (Jossey-Bass, 1985). Department of Education, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA The author declares no competing interests.
The gender gap reconsidered. Nat Hum Behav (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-026-02448-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-026-02448-x
Extract — continue reading at the source.
