sözaltı news Science
Science
EN AZ
There's nothing 'wild' about most wildfires. Humans start them and have made them more dangerous

There's nothing 'wild' about most wildfires. Humans start them and have made them more dangerous

phys.org 13.08.2026 22:40 8 baxış
A wildfire needs a name long before anyone knows what caused it. When the pines of the Gironde in southwestern France caught fire in July, the fire was reported within hours under the name of the ground it was burning. B

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: A wildfire needs a name long before anyone knows what caused it. When the pines of the Gironde in southwestern France caught fire in July, the fire was reported within hours under the name of the ground it was burning.

By the time it had taken 40,000 hectares (99,000 acres), that name was fixed in every bulletin in Europe. The investigation into how it started took longer, and the scientists working out why it ran so far took longer still, publishing into a news cycle that had already moved on. Every large fire has two causes: the spark that lights it and the conditions that let it become so severe.

Naming the fire, though, can hide this, as can reporting. A fire is named in hours, blamed in days and attributed a true cause in weeks. The name comes first, into an almost complete absence of information, and the word we reach for while we wait is "wildfire." It is a strange choice for Europe, where the human share of ignitions is put at roughly 97%.

In the whole run of British fire service records, lightning has been logged as the cause of three wildfires, two of which turned out to be the same fire. This is why a 2024 parliamentary briefing stated flatly that almost all UK wildfires are started by people. The defense is that "wild" never meant natural: A review of wildfire terminology across international glossaries confirms it denotes an unplanned, uncontrolled vegetation fire, "whether natural or human-caused." But nobody consults a glossary before reading a headline, and in that first vacant hour, "wild" places the fire outside human society.

It implies there was no spark—and certainly no humans. While the UK and much of Europe have no official naming conventions, the way fires are named tends to produce much the same outcome as the more formally codified American system. In the U.S., the National Wildfire Coordinating Group's data standard states that names must reference nearby geography and "should not identify responsible parties or otherwise imply culpability or liability," with "Powerline" and "Pipeline" given as banned examples.

So when a Pacific Gas and Electric Company line dropped into dry brush in California in 2018, 85 people died, and the company pleaded guilty to 84 counts of involuntary manslaughter, it was named "the Camp Fire," after Camp Creek Road. One of the century's defining powerline fires was remembered as a road. Then the investigators report and the vacuum fills, which in Europe happens quickly because so many fires are obviously human-caused that the question of how they started rarely stays unanswered for long.

Extract — continue reading at the source.

Read full story