This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: Evidence for hypernovae, theorized to be the most powerful explosions in the universe, has been disputed in two papers by University College London (UCL) researchers. Previous work argued that unusual stars in the Milky Way's halo (the cloud of stars surrounding the disk) and in a neighboring dwarf galaxy could only have formed from material blasted out by a stellar explosion at least 10 times more energetic than a typical supernova.
In two studies published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, researchers found that ordinary supernovae could better explain the unusual makeup of these stars once the uneven way that material is flung into space was taken into account. First author Anmol Aggarwal, a Ph.D. student at the Mullard Space Science Laboratory at UCL, said, "If we look at a supernova today, the star's materials are not spread evenly. Oxygen might predominantly fly in one direction, sulfur in another.
New stars might form from a mix of pieces of the supernova, not its overall mix of elements. "We developed mathematical models that took account of this and found in all cases that stars with a very unusual mix of ingredients were most likely formed from ordinary supernovae. All the evidence we see for hypernovae is suddenly gone." A supernova occurs when a massive star runs out of fuel and collapses in on itself, causing an immense explosion.
A hypernova—a much more energetic explosion—is theorized to occur when the same process happens to a more massive and rapidly spinning star. These explosions fling material into nearby star-forming clouds that form new stars and planets. This process allows researchers to analyze a star's composition and infer its family history (i.e., the stellar explosions that led to its formation).
Ralph Schoenrich, also based at the Mullard Space Science Laboratory at UCL, said, "Just before a star goes supernova, it has layers like an onion, with heavier elements at the center and lighter ones farther out. Our model looks at how much material from each layer or each region would be needed to fit the observed star. "We still don't know how well the supernova material gets mixed before it forms new stars.
That is despite decades of work in this area. Our research suggests some mixing goes on, but incomplete mixing. "We need to take this into account in our models of how chemicals evolve in galaxies and of how the interstellar medium works." Across two studies, the UCL team looked at four stars previously judged to have formed from material expelled by a hypernova.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
