our Twitter (X) feedView our Youtube channelView our Instagram feedView our Substack feedView our Spotify feed Two-time debate champion Bo Seo breaks down why arguments fail, four bad-faith personas that hijack conversations, and a four-question framework for picking worthy fights. Bo Seo is a two-time world champion debater and a former coach of the Australian national debating team and the Harvard College Debating Union. One of the most recognized figures[…] Bo Seo is a two-time world champion debater and a former coach of the Australian national debating team and the Harvard College Debating Union.
One of the most recognized figures[…] Dr. Nicole LePera breaks down the 6 archetypes of childhood trauma. The science, medicine, and mythology of menstruation and menopause The rule of 20%: How to find the sweet spot for improved performance The world’s greatest mathematician explains 6 essential concepts of math Psychologist: The blueprint for developing a healthy relationship with your emotions Depression has tripled in the last 15 years.
Arthur Brooks says he knows the real cause Physician: The outdated mindset that gets in the way of our healing A philosopher’s guide to thinking for yourself in an age built to think for you The psychology of morality, perversion, and revenge, in 67 minutes The full story of the dinosaurs, from extinction to extinction A neuroscientist’s guide to protecting your brain, in 58 minutes The hidden link: Depression, processed food, and your gut microbiome The 3-part habit loop your brain is running 40 percent of the time Body language expert: 7 cues that make you instantly more likable The psychological reason complete freedom is a creative dead end The quantum realm, the cosmological realm, and the multiverse, in 69 minutes How to set better goals and actually follow-through, in 65 minutes This isn’t a trip, it’s the most challenging therapy session of your life Two-time debate champion Bo Seo breaks down why arguments fail: the four bad-faith personas that hijack conversations, a four-question framework for picking fights worth having, and the surprising Cold War standoff between Nixon and Khrushchev that gives us a model for staying cool under pressure. So, I'm a two-time world debate champion, a former coach of the Australian National and Harvard debate teams, and the author of Good Arguments. I felt the need to write good arguments because I think our public conversations are in a state of crisis and that is the more visible crisis that we see where every disagreement out in media or in the public square is a source of division and pain.
But it's also the hidden crisis of all the people who are driven away from participating in those conversations at all because they fear that it's going to be pointless or it's going to be painful and it's not going to be worth their time. Good arguments is not only what democracies have to do. It's what they on their best days aspire to be, which is a conversation between people who disagree sometimes over irreconcilable things to find areas of agreement to spot points where they need to work across their differences to reach a better solution.
One of the reasons why our arguments are so divisive and painful and present is that we've allowed the skills of disagreeing well to atrophy. We no longer view argument as a skill and as something to be worked at. Rather, we see it as something we jump into out of instinct or defensiveness.
The bad arguments that result in turn decrease our confidence in what disagreements can do for us. And when we lack that faith in what arguments can do, we tend to approach them more defensively. We tend to go into it with a more defensive posture.
Extract — continue reading at the source.