This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility: Researchers have demonstrated a series of biological tests that could serve as "proxies" for measuring how different regenerative agriculture practices could improve soil carbon—years before it would be possible to measure the carbon directly. The technique offers new insights into how effective various regenerative practices are at improving soil health.
The phenomenon is explored in a new study from North Carolina State University in collaboration with North Carolina A&T State University and Emory University. The researchers layered multiple regenerative practices on top of one another and then measured biological parameters including enzyme activity, microbial biomass (living microbes) and microbial necromass (dead microbes). All those parameters serve as proxies for the amount of carbon stored in soil.
Soil carbon is a cornerstone of soil health, supporting nutrient cycling, biological activity, soil structure and the long-term functioning of soil ecosystems. Biomass and necromass serve as early markers of soil carbon formation and loss and can be measured years before traditional soil carbon measurements become detectable. "When microbes in the soil consume carbon, they release enzymes to break that carbon down; then they consume some of it," said Debjani Sihi, corresponding author of a paper on the work and an assistant professor of plant and microbial biology and crop and soil sciences at NC State.
"After that, the microbes respire some of the carbon, meaning they spit it back out into the atmosphere. While doing this, they are also building their biomass and necromass when they die." Microbial necromass stores soil carbon effectively over the long term, Sihi said, because necromass carbon can more easily create strong chemical bonds with minerals in the soil. This leads to the creation of a carbon "reservoir," which can help indicate soil health and carbon storage capacity.
Researchers layered regenerative practices including differing levels of tillage (the mechanical preparation of soil for agriculture) and a series of different cover crop mixes onto existing loblolly pine and pecan agroforestry systems on the NC A&T research farm. Differences were observed between the pecan and pine systems—pecan trees showed higher total biomass and influenced soil microbial respiration differently because their broadleaf foliage is more easily degraded by microbes than loblolly pine needles. Enzyme activities also responded to tree species and cover crop treatments, showing that these biological proxies can provide early insights into changes in soil nutrient cycling.
No significant carbon differences were found between minimum- and no-tillage approaches, which Sihi said favored continuing minimum-tillage practices because they confer other benefits, such as reducing weed pressure, without hindering carbon buildup. These findings show that microbial biomass and necromass can be effective early indicators of soil health, offering scientists a powerful tool for approximating soil carbon storage years ahead of when they could normally measure it. The paper, "Soil Carbon Cycle Proxies in a Regenerative Land Management System," is published in the Journal of Natural Resources and Agricultural Ecosystems.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
