sözaltı news Science
Science
EN AZ

Occupational sex segregation is strongly predicted by psychological sex differences

nature.com 22.10.2026 02:00 3 views

If traits of individuals are associated with occupational choice, sex differences in those traits should be associated with sex differences in occupational choice, and consequently, with occupational sex segregation. In this cross-sectional study, we assessed the extent to which this is the case for spatial ability, verbal ability, agreeableness, emotional stability, interest in people and interest in things, across 429 occupations. Participants (N = 2,576, aged 35–45) completed online tests and questionnaires, while students rated occupational requirements.

For each occupation, the population sex composition of people with traits in line with requirements was estimated, using trait sex differences and occupational requirement profiles. Estimates were highly predictive of actual population sex ratios, with the model assessing interest and cognition in conjunction explaining the most variance (R2 = .49), followed by the interest model (R2 = .46) and the cognition model (R2 = .18). Among individual traits, sex differences in interest in things were by far the most predictive (R2 = .42).

Notably, sex differences in cognition were more predictive of high proportions of men in occupations than high proportions of women. Given lifespan trait stability, these results suggest that cognition and interests matter in occupational choice, with sex differences consequently contributing substantially to occupational sex segregation. We thank Martin Asperholm and Elizabeth Guest for their contributions to the data collection.

This research was supported by the Swedish Research Council grant 2022–02114. Division of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Joakim K. Persson, Kimmo Sorjonen, Kåre Hedebrant, Mikael Lundqvist & Agneta Herlitz The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.

If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. Frostegård, J.K.E., Persson, B.N., Sorjonen, K. et al.

Extract — continue reading at the source.

Read full story