sözaltı news Science
Science
EN AZ
Simple logic warnings improve climate argument evaluation across beliefs and partisanship

Simple logic warnings improve climate argument evaluation across beliefs and partisanship

nature.com 21.09.2026 02:00 2 views

Collective climate action requires shared beliefs aligned with scientific consensus, yet fallacious information leads people to misjudge arguments. The mechanisms behind these failures remain unclear. Here we isolate the independent effects of partisan identity, prior beliefs and cognitive limits on argument-quality detection.

Across four preregistered studies (N = 4,000), we introduce a protocol that orthogonally manipulates argument quality and direction across realistic contexts. In neutral contexts, prior beliefs dominated judgements, with partisanship and argument quality having smaller effects. Contrary to identity-protective accounts, embedding arguments in hostile partisan contexts did not increase partisan bias or impair argument-quality detection.

Instead, partisan attacks reduced reliance on prior beliefs, prompting participants to move away from their prior positions. Finally, minimal logic warnings indicating possible fallacies enhanced discrimination between weak and strong arguments. These findings show climate argument evaluation is context sensitive and can be improved with simple logic warnings.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription Receive 12 print issues and online access Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout All data are available via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21964407 (ref. 45). The code to reproduce analysis is available via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21964407 (ref. 45). Hierarchical machine learning models can identify stimuli of climate change misinformation on social media.

Earth Environ. 5, 436 (2024). Growing polarization around climate change on social media. Change 12, 1114–1121 (2022).

Climate hoax: the shift from scientific discourse to speculative rhetoric in climate change conversations. Next Res. 2, 100322 (2025). Nicolosi, E., Medina, R., Brewer, S., Vorkink, M. & Allred, A.

Extract — continue reading at the source.

Read full story