The environment watchdog is being urged to intervene in “cash to trash” planning rules that will allow almost 16,000 new homes in the Norfolk Broads despite the damage to one of the UK’s most environmentally protected areas. Labour’s flagship planning reforms allow damage to protected habitats and species to be overlooked if developers pay into a central nature restoration fund, which is used for conservation actions at a later date. These environmental delivery plans (EDPs) have been called “cash to trash” by critics, who say they roll back decades of environmental law and are a “licence to kill nature”.
The Norfolk Broads, a heavily protected biodiversity hotspot that is home to more than a quarter of the UK’s rarest plants and animals, is the guinea pig for the first EDP. Developers will pay £2,675 per house – £42m in total – and in return get permission to build 15,780 new homes in the Broads. The government’s nature adviser, Natural England, which created the plan, states the development will cause environmental harm in the form of physical, chemical, hydrological and biological damage to the habitats and rare species from increased nitrogen and phosphorus pollution.
The Broads are already in ecological decline and require cuts of 91-97% in nutrient pollution to recover. Chris Hinchliff, the Labour MP for North East Hertfordshire, is calling on the Office for Environmental Protection (OEP) to intervene and stop the approval of the plan. He said the first EDP – which will be used as a blueprint for others – is in breach of the requirements of the government’s Planning and Infrastructure Act, is not based on the best available science and does not address pollution.
In a letter to Natalie Prosser, the chief executive of the OEP, he said: “Unless the OEP acts now, those failures will be locked into the first plan of its kind and repeated in every future EDP that follows. These are protected sites that the plan itself says need pollution inputs cut by up to 97% to recover,” he said. Hinchliff said measures that would have reduced nutrient pollution from the new homes, such as upgrading septic tanks, using small-scale underground treatment plants for homes not connected to the mains sewers and planting riverside buffer strips, were not included in Natural England’s EDP.
Ministers say the EDPs are needed to unblock growth as they pursue a target to build 1.5m new homes by the end of this parliament and are a “win-win” for nature and economic growth. The nature restoration fund, they say, will deliver coordinated, larger-scale conservation measures rather than piecemeal offsets. Broadcaster Chris Packham, who is supporting the campaign against the Norfolk EDP by the charity WildFish, said environmental laws fought for over decades would be cancelled at the stroke of a pen.
The Norfolk Broads EDP is out to consultation, which ends on 31 October. The Wildlife Trusts said the EDP would allow phosphorus from new homes to increase existing pollution levels on the rivers Yare, Bure and Wensum – a delicate chalk stream – without sufficient action from developers to mitigate for the impact. Bradley Tooze, the nature restoration fund director at Natural England, said: “The environment delivery plan aims to deliver better outcomes to protect the precious habitats of the Norfolk Broads while enabling sustainable development, including through river restoration measures and wetland habitat creation.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
