Thomas Massie has spent years playing the Republican Party’s skunk at the garden party. Now, with his congressional career nearly over, the Kentucky Republican has introduced articles of impeachment against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over the Iran war, forcing his colleagues to deal with the guest they would rather leave outside—the bill. The Congressional Budget Office says the Pentagon had incurred more than $38 billion in costs through August 1, with the conflict potentially adding another $3 billion a month.
Massie's impeachment gambit remains a long shot, sure, but its more plausible significance is of a political nature. The lawmaker whom President Donald Trump helped drive from Congress over his serial rebellions is using his final months in Washington to force Republicans to cast a recorded judgment on a war whose costs are becoming harder to separate from the affordability problem the party faces at the polls in November. Call it Massie’s $38 billion Trump dividend—payable in gasoline, inflation and awkward votes.
Massie lost Kentucky’s Republican primary in May to Trump-backed Ed Gallrein after repeatedly breaking with the president, including over Iran, a development that has given him something Republican dissenters rarely enjoy: nothing left to lose. Massie says Hegseth continued hostilities without congressional authorization and is "breaking the law and must be held accountable." His resolution contains eight articles alleging constitutional violations, and House rules mean lawmakers must deal with it by Thursday. Republican leaders can move to table it, and removal of Hegseth appears unlikely, but perhaps that is the wrong measurement.
Massie has turned an argument about congressional war powers into a simpler political question. Do Republicans want their names attached to shutting down a challenge to a war whose Pentagon bill has already passed $38 billion? The strongest answer from the administration’s side is straightforward.
A war’s cost does not, by itself, establish whether the policy is justified and impeachment is meant to address alleged serious misconduct rather than serve as a referendum on an expensive conflict. But the $38 billion figure earns a very specific type of political power. The CBO estimates the war will push inflation roughly half a percentage point higher than previously expected in early 2027, largely through higher energy costs tied to disrupted oil and gas shipments.
Those statistics turn a foreign policy argument into something more tangible for ordinary voters, a change at a gas pump. So, technically, Massie does not need Republicans to suddenly embrace his anti-war politics; he just needs enough voters to begin treating Iran as another line on the household ledger. The irony here is palpable: Trump won the immediate battle when his endorsed candidate defeated Massie 54 percent to 46 percent.
Extract — continue reading at the source.
