sözaltı news Science
Science
EN AZ

SGA-based volleyball teaching with explicit life skills instruction is associated with technical-tactical, psychosocial, and motivational improvements in school students

nature.com 02.10.2026 02:00 2 views

This quasi-experimental study examined whether a school volleyball unit based on the Step-Game-Approach model combined with explicit life skills teaching (SGA + LS) was associated with changes in technical-tactical performance, life skills, motivation, and perception of success. Eighty-eight students aged 10–12 years participated in a quasi-experimental repeated-measures design with three groups: SGA + LS, direct instruction, and control. The intervention comprised 18 Physical Education classes.

Outcomes were assessed before and/or after the intervention using IAD-VB, Life Skills Scale for Sport, Behavioral Regulation in Sport Questionnaire, and Perception of Success Questionnaire. Generalized Estimating Equations tested group, time, and group×time effects. Significant group × time interactions that remained significant after false discovery rate correction were observed for goal setting, Wald χ²(2) = 11.875, pFDR=0.009, time management, Wald χ²(2) = 10.203, pFDR=0.014, and communication, Wald χ²(2) = 7.538, pFDR=0.044.

All technical-tactical outcomes showed significant adjusted interactions, Wald χ²(2) = 10.764–60.676, pFDR≤0.012, with both volleyball-specific conditions showing improvements across several outcomes. At post-test, SGA + LS showed higher decision-making than control, whereas SGA + LS and direct instruction did not differ significantly after Holm adjustment. For motivational regulation, significant adjusted interactions remained for identified regulation, global intrinsic motivation, goal achievement, stimulating experiences, and knowledge mastery, pFDR≤0.021.

No adjusted group × time effect was observed for perceptions of success. Overall, the findings indicate selective rather than uniform associations between SGA + LS and technical-tactical, psychosocial, and motivational outcomes in school Physical Education. We want to thank the Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás (FAPEG), the Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano - Campus Ceres, and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for their support of this research.

This research did not receive any external funding. Therefore, there are no funders or grant IDs to report. Faculdade de Educação Física, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brasil Carolinne Silva Gonçalves, Débora Darck Lopes Costa Arantes, Marcelo Couto Jorge Rodrigues, Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira & Gustavo De Conti Teixeira Costa Universidade Evangélica de Goiás, Anápolis, Brasil Department of Biomechanics, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdańsk, 80-336, Poland Polytechnic University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal Sport Physical Activity and Health Research & Innovation Center, Applied Research Institute, Polytechnic University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal Faculty of Medicine, Katowice Business University, Katowice, Poland Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia Goiano, Ceres, Brasil Núcleo de Estudos em Performance Analysis Esportiva, Centro de Educação Física e Desportos, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brasil Correspondence to Gustavo De Conti Teixeira Costa.

The authors declare no competing interests. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Goiás (Universidade Federal de Goiás, Brazil) under protocol CAAE: 65290217.2.0000.5083. All procedures were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments.

Extract — continue reading at the source.

Read full story